
I got to spend some time with the new Google Pixel 8 Pro ahead of its launch, and the new premium flagship is impressive, though very similar to last year’s model. The back glass is matte in a first for the Pixel Pro lineup, but the phone otherwise resembles its predecessor on the outside almost exactly. Inside, there are some meaningful upgrades, however — including to Pixel’s industry-leading camera system.
It’s hard to properly test out camera upgrades within the confines of a hands-on testing area, and this one in particular had really difficult lighting with a heady mix of bright warm artificial and ample natural lighting competing to throw off any efforts at decent white balance. Even so, the pictures I was able to take with the new cameras, which include a much-improved new 48 megapixel ultrawide lens, a 50 megapixel main wide (24mm equivalent) lens and a 48 megapixel 5x telephoto, looked great on the device and seem to represent a decent bump, even if you’re already using last year’s model.

Upgrades on the software side this year include a slew of new manual “Pro” controls for those who want to tweak capture particulars in more specific ways, as well as improvements to skin tone accuracy, and the new “Best Take” feature that lets you swap out individual faces in a group photo so you can, for example, make sure everyone is looking at the camera or smiling even if you don’t have a single frame where that’s true for everyone at once. This looks like a very neat feature, but I wasn’t able to properly test it in the demo environment, so it’ll have to wait for the full review for more details on how well that works. Magic Eraser, which lets you automatically remove elements of the photo, did work great in my brief testing, though that’s been true for a while now on Pixel phones.
Another curious new feature that you’ll find the hardware for around back on the camera bump is a built-in temperature sensor. It works with an included thermometer app, and its purpose is… to take the temperature of things? It’s definitely a bit of a wild swing for a smartphone, since it’s not tied to any particular health or photographic system application. In the onboarding flow when you open the app, it points out that accuracy may vary and that it works best within two inches of whatever surface you’re looking to measure, and that it works only for surface temps and not for internal. There’s also a material selection prompt to help improve accuracy.
I tried it out on a few different surfaces, including another person’s forehead (it’s explicitly not designed for body temp readings, note) and it seemed to be within a rough range of what I’d expect. It’s hard to gauge since I don’t actually know the temperature of most things, but for a forehead for instance, it read 88.5 degrees F which is shy of the average healthy body temp, but quite close.